Industrial Revolution 4.0: Risks, Sustainability, and Implications for OIC States


  • Ildus Rafikov Maqasid Institute Global
  • Riaz Ansary International Shari’ah Research Academy (ISRA)


Industrial Revolution 4.0, Sustainable Developments Goals, complex systems, risks, artificial intelligence, maqasid al-shari’ah


This paper reviews the potential risks of the fourth industrial revolution and how sustainable development goals align with those risks and any benefits. This paper adopts a qualitative research method using content analysis of video and textual materials. This research finds that the increased complexity of IR4.0 carries greater risks but offers greater benefits to humanity. Sustainability is going to be positively affected by the greater use of smart interconnected technologies. However, the fabric of human society will undergo a tremendous change that will often lead to unwanted consequences. Many risks can be anticipated and addressed by designing systems, including financial and economic, that are inherently robust and adaptable. States must acknowledge the risks associated with new technologies and complex systems, such as artificial intelligence, and devise strategies to help deal with and anticipate those risks. This paper identifies the risks and benefits of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, implications for sustainability, and proposes a maqasid-based approach to IR4.0 related policy in OIC countries. This paper is intended for researchers in the area of public policy, OIC, Islamic economics and for policymakers interested in adopting the maqasid framework.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ildus Rafikov, Maqasid Institute Global

Senior Fellow and Manager of Research, Science and Technology at Maqasid Institute Global

Riaz Ansary, International Shari’ah Research Academy (ISRA)

Senior Researcher at International Shari’ah Research Academy (ISRA).


Abdelgafar, Basma. Public Policy: Beyond Traditional Jurisprudence. London: IIIT, 2018.

AI-HLIEG. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.

AI-HLIEG. A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Discipline. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2010.

Baum, Seth. ‘A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy,’ Global Catastrophic Risk Institute. Available at:

Blue Synergy Associates. ‘Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA),’ Blue Synergy Associates. Available at:

Davidson, Helen. ‘First Covid-19 Case Happened in November, China Government Records Show – Report,’ The Guardian. Available at:

Frontline PBS, ‘In the Age of AI (full film): FRONTLINE,’ Youtube. Available at:

Ibn Ashur. Treatise of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah. Translated by Mohamed El-Tahir El-Mesawi. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2006.

International Organization for Standardization. ‘ISO 31000:2018(en) - Risk Management – Guidelines,’ International Organization for Standardization. Available at:

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Maqasid Al-Shari’ah, Ijtihad and Civilisational Renewal. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2012.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘Maqasid Al-Shari’ah and Ijtihad as Instruments of Civilisational Renewal: A Methodological Perspective.’ Islam and Civilisational Renewal 2, no.2 (2011): 246.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. An Introduction to Shari’ah. Kuala Lumpur: Ilmiah Publishers, 2006.

Lapidus, Ira M. A History of Islamic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Meek, Taylor, Husam Barham, Nader Beltaif, Amani Kaadoor, and Tanzila Akhter. Managing the Ethical and Risk Implications of Rapid Advances in Artificial Intelligence: A Literature Review. Honolulu: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, 2016.

Mitchell, Anna, and Larry Diamond. ‘Chinaʼs Surveillance State Should Scare Everyone,’ The Atlantic. Available at:

Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patric Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. ‘The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.’ Big Data and Society 3, no. 2 (2016): 1-21.

Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. ‘History,’ Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Available at:

Pfeifer, Rolf, and Christian Scheier. Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999.

Phillips, Peter. Giants: The Global Power Elite. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2018.

Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017.

Scheidel, Walter. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.

Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2016.

Stockwell, Scott. ‘A Framework for Industry 4.0,’ IBM. Available at:

Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, Rupert Read, Raphael Douady, Joseph Norman, and Yaneer Bar-Yam. ‘The Precautionary Principle (with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms),’ Extreme Risk Initiative, New York University School of Engineering Working Paper Series (2014). Available at:

UNDRR. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019.

United Nations General Assembly. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 A/Res/70/1. New York: United Nation, 2015.

VPRO Documentary. ‘Shoshana Zuboff On Surveillance Capitalism,’ Youtube. Available at:

World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2020. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2020.

World Economic Forum. Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-up Across Global Supply Chains. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2014.

Yvanovich, Rick. ‘Industry 4.0 - Opportunities and Challenges,’ TRG International. Available at:




How to Cite

Ildus Rafikov, and Riaz Ansary. 2020. “Industrial Revolution 4.0: Risks, Sustainability, and Implications for OIC States”. ICR Journal 11 (2):298-324.